September 1, 2016
Leave a comment on paragraph 1 0
Please log in to the parent site for access.
Data Visualization on Edwards’ “Images or Shadows of Divine Things”
This whole passage was super interesting to me, but the Roses section was my favorite. He makes it clear that while he is appreciating how beautiful roses are, he is also talking about Christ. I think he makes it clear that he will always attribute the beauty of nature to God. I especially liked this section because at the end he talks about how on the rose bush, the thorns grow before anything else, and then the roses grow. He is saying that even beautiful things can come from terrible things.
When you say beautiful things come from terrible things it make me reference some ideas that i got from the passages in “Beauty of the World”. The last passage talked about how the people would rather live in pain and suffering than lose the beauty of the world that God created for them and i think that ties rather perfectly to your thought that beautiful things can come from terrible things. Perhaps their situation might night be ideal and that could be the thorns; the struggles and hardships but the roses are the beauty around them if they keep believing in God’s grace and presence beauty will grow from the thorns and not only will lives be better but the world will still be just as beautiful.
Alyssa, I agree with your comment. The metaphors that come with a rose have always been interesting to me. They can mean so many different things. I think this goes along perfectly with the story in the Bible of how Christ had to die for the forgiveness of all sins and so that all of humanity has the opportunity to go to heaven. Edwards symbolizes how the thorns, or the death of Jesus is what saved us and gave us this beautiful flower. It is the perfect example of a Puritan piece of literature.
What a shockingly developed piece of prose that transitions from a kind of praise into an almost contradiction of itself in a warning to make the descent, to put in the effort, to deal with the sweat and hardship, because laziness and lack of discipline, that being strict observance of God’s word, leads only to heartache and despair in the “valley’s” or “hell.” To Edward’s knowledge, the way to heaven which is here likened as a mountain or hill, is not accomplished easily, but rather with much “hardship…self-denial (and) labor.” He then goes on to describe water, found within the crevice of valleys underneath mountains, is a symbol of misery, and refers to scripture making this tie in of water being tied to with the wrath of God. It is interesting as well, that he does refer to water as he does in his next piece, “rivers,” however he titles the piece “Hills and Mountains” showing his mind and heart are pointed up to the rewards of heaven rather than the temptations of the valley, or hell.
This passage reminded me of Bradstreet’s thoughts in “Contemplations” in that both authors bring about the idea of cohesiveness through the comparison of people joining together and heading towards God as rivers meeting up and rushing to the sea. However, Edwards takes his comparison a little further by reminding readers that “all the rivers together, great and small, together with all the brooks and little streams, can’t raise the waters of the ocean in the least degree”, in other words, God does not benefit from uniting with humanity since He is already great, only humanity has something to gain by being with Him.
Edwards is giving us a kind of “natural typology” in this work, finding evidence of Christian ideas in the natural world through correspondent types, just as the Puritan reader of Scripture looks for the repetition of Biblical types in human events. In response to Deistic arguments that Nature should replace the Bible as a source of truth and values, Edwards seeks to align nature with Scripture as a means for bolstering traditional Christian faith.
The imagery in this paragraph is so simple yet paints a beautiful truth. The correlation between a rose growing upon brairs and bearing all things for christ is very simply introduced. The idea that beauty can can come from even the ugliest of places is very hope inspiring which is what Christ was, inspiring, and was a symbol of hope for humanity. The roses symbolize new hope from the ruins or destruction and it becomes in the end there is Christ similar to the Roses growing from the brains.
In this section, Jonathan Edwards creates a lovely metaphor of the roots, trunk, branches, and fruit of the tree as a representation of Christ, God, and those who follow him. There are a few salient aspects from this section that were unique and meaningful, putting faith in a new light and making faith in Christ easier to comprehend for the reader. First, Christ as the trunk of the tree and the people as the branches could not be easier to understand, the savior Christ is the stability of believers, he is the strength that his people can rely on. Second, the metaphor of the winters being difficult for the branches and the fruit. One could connect winters to the difficult times that colonizers have encountered and how they maintained it made their faith stronger, symbolized by the summers, where the tree flourishes. Finally, the old testament is represented by the roots of the tree, where the roots underground are unseen but still serve the purpose of the beginning phase of the God’s plan. In this metaphor Abraham and David planted the tree so that God could then lift the “veil” on his plan for Christ’s deliverance.
The imagery here is beautiful mixed in with some more melancholy rhetoric in order to paint a bigger picture of the way that things are not always all good, or all bad. By contrast, most everything in life has both bad and good qualities. To me, this part is is an analogy how in life, you have to take the good with the bad, and be able to recognize the good as works of god and his absolute sovereignty. This paragraph also exemplifies the concept that beautiful things come from labor. This seems to go along with the concept that Marry Rowlandson discusses in her captivity narrative about “reaping the fruit of good labor”.
Login to leave a comment on the whole Page
Login to leave a comment on paragraph 1
You must be logged in to post a comment.
March 3, 2018 at 9:46 pm
See in context
February 26, 2018 at 10:16 pm
February 25, 2018 at 8:47 pm
February 22, 2018 at 7:01 am
February 21, 2018 at 8:44 pm
February 21, 2018 at 1:56 am
February 15, 2018 at 10:53 am
February 15, 2018 at 10:10 am
February 14, 2018 at 4:43 pm
February 11, 2018 at 2:36 pm
April 30, 2018 at 10:35 pm
In Charles Brockden Brown’s article, “The Difference between History and Romance” he writes about the novel, Wieland, and the relationship that the novel has between history and romance. He explains how history and romance are intertwined and how imperfections of man are part of our future, present, and past. In this paragraph, Clara is overtaken by her senses of this man, “I count among the most extraordinary incidents of my life”. Clara is an irrational character taken over by romantic ideas. Her history and her future are based on her emotional decisions. There is no separation between the two. Brockden Brown writes, “when busy in assigning motives to actions, are not historians but romancers.” Which relates directly to what is happening to Clara in this passage. When talking about history, it is the “noting and recording of the actions of men” which I think is very important because mankind is often if not always driven by passion and emotion. This also plays well with the strong theme of passion and emotion that is current throughout Wieland and all the characters.
Barnard, Philip, and Stephen Shapiro, editors. “The Difference Between History and Romance.” Wieland or the Transformation, with Related Texts, by Charles Brockden Brown, Hackett Publishing Company, Inc., 2009, pp. 195–198.
April 27, 2018 at 11:10 pm
This passage is very focused on individualism, Franklin seems to be looking at the better things in his life instead of focusing on the negative. He doesn’t dwell on the idea that he wish he lived life without committing fault instead he touches on it and shifts into how he’s basically glad with how he’s lived life. In “Benjamin Franklin’s Autobiography and the Education of America.” Steven Forde presents the idea that Franklin Autobiography should be used as a model of developing good character and morals. Franklin states, “conceived the bold and arduous project of arriving at moral perfection”, but soon realizes that he had, “undertaken a task of more difficulty than he had imagined.” Forde believes, “each of the loopholes… is deliberate”. The loopholes represent another idea, that being that when striving for greater morality the individual must also take all aspects of life in consideration and be reasonable. Forbes introduces another idea, “If Franklin had viewed virtue more strictly, he might have been forced to give up on it”.
Forde, Steven. “Benjamin Franklin’s Autobiography and the Education of America.” The American Political Science Review, vol. 86, no. 2, 1992, pp. 357–368. JSTOR, JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/1964225.
April 27, 2018 at 4:40 pm
In her article “What’s Wrong With Charlotte Temple” Marion Rust addresses Charlotte’s passions as well as her inability to make decisions and relates it to her overall fall from her position in society. Rust uses this paragraph as an example of Charlotte’s indecisiveness. Here it is exemplified that Charlotte can’t even make a simple decision on her own. She has to reach out to her mentor in order to decide what to even do with something as simple as a written letter. Rust catapults off this point by claiming that Charlotte’s future will continue to be unguided and spiral downward farther than she already has. Rust bases this claim on the idea that Charlotte will not be able to support herself because she is always looking to some one outside herself to guide her through obstacles.
Rust, Marion. “What’s Wrong with ‘Charlotte Temple?”.” The William and Mary Quarterly, vol. 60, no. 1, 2003, pp. 99–118. JSTOR, JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/3491497.
April 27, 2018 at 4:16 pm
Andrew Scheiber’s article “The Arm Lifted against Me”: Love, Terror and the Construction of Gender in “Wieland” explores Clara’s gendered role in Charles Brockden Brown’s Wieland. Scheiber points to patterns of Clara’s marginalization and enclosure throughout the story, specifically in relation to her role in the context of the familial structure of the story’s plot. Scheiber explains that, “though the Age of Reason invites her to identify herself with the life of the mind, Clara is barred by her womanhood from fully achieving such an identification, since the gender ideology of the times defines the intellect as secondary rather than primary, to the essence of “feminine” nature” (Schieber 178) which is an interesting perspective considering the emphasis on reason and intellect throughout the story, and the fact that Clara is the primary protagonist of the story. Schieber claims that when Clara questions the audience, “was I not likewise transformed from rational and human into a creature of nameless and fearful attributes” (Brown 137) that she is exposing her “self-condemnation” that is born out of the gendered system that relates “rational” and “human” on the masculine side of gender axis, and the negation of those qualities to the feminine side of the axis.
Brown, Charles Brockden, Philip Barnard, and Stephen Shapiro. Wieland ; or the Transformation. An American Tale with Related Texts. Indianapolis: Hackett Pub., 2009. Print.
Scheiber, Andrew J. “‘The Arm Lifted against Me’: Love, Terror, and the Construction of Gender in ‘Wieland.’” Early American Literature, vol. 26, no. 2, 1991, pp. 173–194.
April 27, 2018 at 4:07 pm
In his article, entitled ‘Rip Van Winkle and the Generational Divide in American Culture’, scholar Robert A. Ferguson examines the character of Rip Van Winkle in depth and identifies some of the key flaws that keep this iconic figure of early American Folklore in conversation to this day. One of the flaws identified in Ferguson’s article is the issue of drink, which is brought up in the selected paragraph. Ferguson argues that Rip’s problems with being a “naturally thirsty soul” can be attributed to and explain his lack of success in life: “Habitual drinking keeps him from the steady application that every good farm requires” (533). This explanation of Rip’s tendency to ‘bum around’ aligns to the events of the story, as well as illuminating a reason why he continues to be a influential character in American literature. According to Ferguson, “We value Rip most of all because we find something of our own foibles in him, not because we worry about drink or because we fear an encounter with Heinrich Hudson when we enter the Kaatskill Mountains. Rip’s faults…are our own bad habits carried to extremes. Irving keeps to the lighter side of these extremes” (533-534). Through the relatable aspects and complexities of Rip’s character, readers throughout the years are enabled, through Irving’s lighthearted storytelling, to return to this original American folktale with as timeless a perspective as the readers who scanned the first print-warmed lines of this work.
Ferguson, Robert A. “Rip Van Winkle and the Generational Divide in American Culture.” Early American Literature, vol. 40, no. 3, 2005, pp. 529–544. JSTOR, JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/25057421.
April 27, 2018 at 3:46 pm
In “Charlotte Temple and the End of Epistolarity” by Blythe Forcey, it is said that the motherly affection of the narrator is what really makes this story relatable. I found this article to be interesting because I think that it very true. I think the way that the narrator acts in a motherly way really helps the story along. Forcey states, “Early American readers were able, as they read this novel, to live through a nightmare of dislocation, alienation, and abandonment that mapped their worst fears. But, guided by the careful and caring narrative of Mrs. Rowson, they emerged safe and unscathed, with all troubling ambiguities and terrors temporarily put to rest” (227-228). I think this is a very important quote because it makes you, as the reader, realize just how good of an author Susana Rowson truly was. To be able to make her readers feel safe even during a scary time, all due to the way this story is narrated. Forcey also states, “The motherly character of Rowson’s narrative voice is evident from her first addresses to the reader… Thus she offers, quite explicitly, to stand in for those ‘natural friends’ that the reader might have lost and to protect them from the horrors of the world” (228). I think this is a very important statement as well. Forcey makes it clear that even from the very first sentence of this story, Susana Rowson manages to take our hand and make us feel safe.
Forcey, Blythe. “Charlotte Temple and the End of Epistolarity.” American Literature, vol. 63, no. 2, 1991, pp. 225–241. JSTOR, JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/2927163.
April 27, 2018 at 3:45 pm
I also really loved this line. The Earth is the beginning and the end of the cycle of life, and that gets so overlooked in our day to day struggles. Nature and death are like you said, both important parts of the cycle of life. The connection being made in these two lines applies to most of what we have studied through the semester in this class. Even the puritans had themes of nature as a part of their beliefs. Nature and death are the two things that connect humanity because no human on Earth can avoid either one of these things. We will all die and become a part of nature once more, because that is how we began the cycle.
April 27, 2018 at 3:12 pm
Within this passage, we witness the first instance of Charlotte beginning to distrust her own instincts. While at the party she was led to believe would be fun and entertaining, she realizes that being obedient and staying home would have been better than sneaking out with La Rue. As the story progresses we see Charlotte trust those instincts less and, according to Marion Rust’s article “What’s Wrong with ‘Charlotte Temple'”, her behavior becomes increasingly described as some “form of collapse, in which her future direction is determined by nothing more deliberate than her center of gravity.” This continual falling down that Charlotte experiences effectively acts to demonstrate Rowson’s commentary on the unreliability of young women’s own moral character and how they are insufficiently able to stand up to the force of external moral corruption.
/* Style Definitions */
mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;
font-family:”Times New Roman”;}
Rust, Marion. “What’s Wrong with ‘Charlotte Temple?”.” The William and Mary Quarterly, vol. 60, no. 1, 2003, pp. 99–118.
April 27, 2018 at 2:25 pm
Throughout her essay, “Olaudah Equiano, Written by Himself”, Cath N. Davidson expresses the aspects which make the text so significant. She explains the strength of emotion that is brought because the narrative is told from Equiano himself. She also expresses that the non-traditional storytelling is what makes it interesting and evokes emotion throughout. Davidson ultimately points out that, “Many aspects of the text make it significant, but especially impressive is it expansive reach” (19). His story is told in many parts of the world and allows readers to feel this narrative from place to place based on his narrating abilities. For example, Equiano himself states “in the preceding chapter I have set before the reader a few of those many instances of oppression, extortion, and cruelty, which I have been a witness to in the West Indies”. As readers have been taken from place to place Equiano stops to show the places he’s been and the things he’s seen. Davidson also points out the emotion-evoking tones and voice used by Equiano. Addressing the many aspects of the text Davidson writes, The text combines (in unequal parts) slave narrative, sea yarn, military adventure, ethnographic reportage, historical fiction, travelogue, picaresque saga, sentimental novel, allegory, tall tale, pastoral origins myth, gothic romance, conversion tale, and abolitionist tract, with different features coming to the fore at different times, and the mood vacillating accordingly” (20). His slave trade journey was terrible and cruel; as readers see Equiano journey from place to place they empathize with him more and begin to realize the terrible conditions in which he was under. The narrative of Equiano become more and more effective for readers because of the places Equiano takes us and the voice he uses to evoke that emotion out of readers.
Davidson, Cathy N. “Olaudah Equiano, Written by Himself.” NOVEL: A Forum on Fiction, vol. 40, no. 1/2, 2006, pp. 18–51. JSTOR, JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/40267683.
April 27, 2018 at 1:26 pm
According to William Pencak, author of “Benjamin Franklin’s Biography, Cotton Mather, and a Puritan God,” in this paragraph, Franklin is defending the stakes on which he wrote his autobiography, as well as defending his own morality. Franklin was very dedicated to his moral standing with himself and God and went through extreme measures to ensure that he would end up on the ‘right’ side of things. This particular passage is about the ‘justification of his book’ which ‘illustrates an important philosophical point: the need for ideal principles, realized in practice, to subdue “Natural Inclination,” as well as the bad effects of, “Custom and Company” (Pencak 8). The ‘artifice’ that Franklin describes represents the civilization of people that he is surrounded by and he believes that they should be informed of his knowledge, life, and commitment to God. Franklin didn’t believe that being religious meant attending church, donating to pastors, or things alike. It was about believing in God, Praying honestly, and being virtuous. Throughout this autobiography, Franklin defends and justifies his beliefs and morality.
Pencak, William. “BENJAMIN FRANKLIN’S AUTOBIOGRAPHY, COTTON MATHER, AND A PURITAN GOD.” Pennsylvania History: A Journal of Mid-Atlantic Studies, vol. 53, no. 1, 1986, pp. 1–25. JSTOR, JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/27773087.
Website content © ENGL 375 Readings 2018. All rights reserved.